DISQUS

The Angelsoft Blog: Angel Investor Groups: Getting Radical about Transparency?

  • Bill Payne · 11 months ago
    How was I supposed to answer a question if (1) I thought entrepreneurs would benefit from the information, but (2) I or my group are unwilling to share? I answered #1. Perhaps others did as well.
    Bill Payne
  • drstarcat · 11 months ago
    Good question Bill. We put those two answers at opposite ends on purpose to encourage GMs to consider the issue. No doubt many managers felt both ways, but it's interesting to see the choice you make when you only have one!
  • Rod Van Sciver · 11 months ago
    I like the idea of providing group information as long as there is no direct link to specific individuals. Most entrepreneurs are respectful of member privacy. A few can become over aggressive (maybe the mark of a great entrepreur?)

    I think transparency and metrics benefits everyone. The entrepreneur better understand the probablity of getting funded and can decide if the application effort is worthwhile. Groups are able to benchmark themselves against other groups. Metrics encourage groups to keep their deal flow organized and timely so their "grades" stay up.

    I would like to see a metric that measures the group's feedback to entrepreneurs. One of the reason we are angels is to help startups. Yet we often drop the ball when it come to giving presenters honest feedback when we choose not to do a deal.
  • Rob Ritch · 11 months ago
    The reason some information needs to be hidden is that it could hurt conservative groups because entreprenuers will not think they do enough deals to apply to when in reality they do but they are just picky.
  • Frank Peters · 11 months ago
    it's about the maintenance of these statistics, I don't want to have to update my site, my database and now Angelsoft, too.
  • evbart · 11 months ago
    Frank,

    Angelsoft is your database! When you're using it for all your deals, you'd have all these stats automatically. Thats half the value in using our system, VCs and angel groups LOVE not having to manually track these stats anymore.

    Best,

    Evan
  • Stan · 11 months ago
    Of course entrepreneurs would like more information - but it IS NOT something our group wants to share. Realistically many Angel groups serve a geography - our group will not look at deals that are not from our state unless there is an explicit connection. We know our regional groups and syndication that way makes sense. It is the same as referrals to our group or VCs, the vast majority of completed deals come from trusted connections. Even if there was data on the site I wouldn't trust it.

    Every group uses your tools in different ways. Trying to use your data does not paint an accurate story of one group versus another.

    How many $100M or $200M VC funds are there? (yeah - but what size are they really)
    Outside of pension funds - please show me VC, HF, PE that want to public show their data.

    I would highly suggest you make the data piece optional
  • drstarcat · 11 months ago
    Stan,

    These are all great points, and of course, anything we do will have controls to allow groups to protect their privacy. The real question was if enough groups would be willing to share this information to make it worth building the feature at all.

    Cordially,

    Ryan
  • Leland Nelson · 11 months ago
    For an entrepreneur looking for funding - from 1) a Funded source and 2) an angel investment or venture capital group - this is very important. Transparency, yes! It would be great to have prior knowledge of these groups and types of investment they are move apt to make and to what industry/criteria. Most of these groups will not flat out tell you the type of investments they make with major investigations. Prior investment history would quickly show the entrepreneur which investors to spend "more" time on.
  • john · 11 months ago
    Its simply rubbish to believe as an entrepreneur I am going to do business with an investor group who is not forthcoming on such information.

    I am simply not going to provide my companies details or spend valuable time and resources without such historical information, what is the investors track record, what is the average amount invested, length of time to invest, what like company's have they invested in.

    Rather then casting a huge net and pursuing an endless group of fruitless opportunities I want to focus on real potential opportunities, I will work with those investor groups who can provide such information, the ones that dont I wont.
  • evbart · 11 months ago
    Great discussion here!

    Its pretty clear from everyone involved that this information is extremely valuable to all parties.

    When executed appropriately, transparency can do a lot of amazing things for early stage investing:

    1) establish and build an investment groups reputation/credibility
    2) build trust with the entrepreneurs and set more realistic expectations
    3) make investors more comfortable sharing deals and co-investing, which is something we're seeing a lot more through the economic crisis.

    Am I missing any? Not only is it useful for entrepreneurs, but its crucial for trust building within the investment community.

    So everyone finds the data valuable, everyone wants the data, but no one is willing to share it? Any ideas how we break the catch-22?
  • drstarcat · 11 months ago
    How about if I just drop the feature and let my account managers triage the damage?
  • Mark Tarasov · 10 months ago
    Misters Investors - Angels
    I represent you my projects:
    The project 1. Factory for manufacturing of new ecologically pure sources of electric energy.
    For them it is not necessary fuel gramme.
    They can be established under water in any reservoir (the river, lake, the sea, pool). From them it is possible to create power stations from 1 MW to 10000 MW.
    The sum is necessary for project realisation 12000000 Euros.
    Term of realisation of the project 2 years.
    Term of return of investments 2 years (after the beginning of work of factory).
    Profit not less than 20000000 Euros a year.
    The project 2. Manufacture of energy sources (220В, 50 or 60 Hz) capacity of 1 kw.
    Scope:
    The electric энергия (for the private house, apartment)- Without pay: heating, cooking, illumination, hot water, the computer, the TV etc.
    It is new electric transport (motor vehicles, buses, trolley buses).
    These are absolutely new trains.
    These are absolutely new planes
    And all without fuel and without emissions of hotbed gases.
    The necessary Sum for realisation of the project 10 000 000 Euros.
    Term of realisation of the project of 18 months
    Term of return of investments 2 years
    Profit not less than 25 000 000Вро in a year.
    3-5 kw are necessary for heating and cooking.

    Misters investors it not a joke-it a reality.
    I invite you to become our investors-partners.
    It is many workplaces, it is a pure planet the Earth.

    Mark Tarasov, director SIA DTSP, Riga, Latvia.
    e-mail: mark_tarasov@inbox.lv
  • drstarcat · 10 months ago
    Normally, I'd probably moderate out a solicitation for investment like the one above, but it's indicative of WHY our investors are so cautious about their privacy. No one likes to be inappropriately solicited, and we work very hard at Angelsoft to protect our users.

    Groups should not confuse privacy and lack of transparency though. The stats in the group profile are a win-win for everyone:

    1. Group General managers have a concrete reason to get their angels to participate more fully if that activity is going to be publicly visible.
    2. Real entrepreneurs can more effectively manage their fund-raising and NOT spam groups indiscriminately.
    3. Groups can get to know each other, so they are more comfortable working together.

    No group should be embarrassed about who they are. If their members don't participate during a particular season, entrepreneurs should know. If the current financial climate has slowed investment, potential partners should know. Everyone in this community, entrepreneurs, angel groups, AND VCs, tries to inflate who they are, and it doesn't help anyone.

    We're all in this together. We're all trying to promote innovation, build jobs in our communities, and do something meaningful. This ENTIRE industry needs to step into the light. We'll all be more successful if it does.
  • Tom · 10 months ago
    I am an entrepreneur and SEC registered Fund manager looking to raise funds. Our experience has been that investor interest and focus can be too narrow; such as “only interested in bio” or “manufacturing and distributing (consumer) products”. And, it “should or must be a regional” entity.

    Are we looking for the BEST opportunities; or just the best regional/industry opps?

    How do new or innovative and alternative investment opportunities gain traction? It would seem you have the criteria and evaluation framework to identify ANY and ALL qualified opportunities. Or to identify “best of breed” of multiple opportunities. These can then be ‘filtered’ by each individual investor.

    Regarding the “sharing of information” : the goal should be the same for all of us (investors / entrepreneurs / networks / groups); and that is TO GROW THE PIE so that each our slices grow bigger. Instead of approaching this as separate factions, perhaps we should be approaching this as a CONSORTIUM; each having separate objectives but all COMMON interests.

    Adding and sharing information is ADDING VALUE ! Putting it bluntly, I want to be of value to you .. and I hope you want to be of value to me !!

    Tom@art-investing-group.com
  • garyjameswentworth · 3 months ago
    Good morning Tom,
    I hope I find you in good health and happy. I am Gary, a visual artist and independent producer, and posted a request for start up Capital, that was a while back and thankfully thus far, with all the financial turmoil, I have managed to keep my head above the choppy waters and continue doing what I do.
    I established a Community Based Organization in 2005 after spending the previous 25 years in the Transportation Industry. "Art a part of life" was the motto and ARTAPART the gallery and performance venue became a reality. Our country has a vivid history and the yearning to remove the restrictions of the existing "art appreciation endeavors" led us to rightly conclude that the general public required a non pretentious facility to enjoy the best local and international exhibitions that we could host. Following on the success of the brand we opened in an area closer to a larger cross section of the population, our opening unfortunately tied in exactly with the credit crash in late 2008 and has now seen me revert back to our original concept and fulfill the mandate in other manners. My business model is unique and engages over two hundred people per annum, the turnover has increased by 33% year on year thus far and all the opportunities that abound are self made and action-ed by my creative team.
    Next year 2010 sees my country hosting the FIFA World cup and the upsurge in positivity has led to numerous opportunities available to various enterprises especially within the Tourism and Entertainment industries, and it is within this cycle that I seek to modify my request for an investor. My core business revolves around Corporate Social Responsibility and assistance from formal banking avenues does not really apply and the required investment from an "Angel Investor" will see returns that are competitive in any financial manner. My business is run very informal and complete transparency is a core issue of the ongoing success, we have received the mandate for the third year in a row to host a community festival from the 22nd to the 27th February 2010, and on the 1st and 2nd of September 2009 we are producing Live Rage (See attachment) at our national State Theater, I have obtained a television contract for a local music show and I am developing a project to fix all of the children's play parks in my community. With the correct investor these projects will be realized in a sustainable manner with large growth potential.
    The immediate reply from all possible avenues, has thus far amounted to "We do not have money" and my reply can only be "Its not about the money" and then go on a tangent about the lack of social responsibility and end up just doing it anyway, pure survivalist mode as an Artist creating art that everyone enjoys. I do not envisage an investor who places money in a bank account and then want nothing further to do, I would expect the investor to visit and spend at least a week in my company before making a final decision.
    See you soon.
  • Powerwatch1P · 10 months ago
    Hi Ryan,
    Thanks for the update. I think the investors have much to gain by transparency. They will probably find they get fewer requests, not more, by giving information entrepreneurs can use to determine their viability.
    As an entrepreneur myself, I have to spend my time on many activities, including funding. To avoid spending time futilely on requests from sources that aren't interested in the first place would be much appreciated.
    Keep up the good work.
    -Tom Doench
  • Gary · 7 months ago
    Hello, I am Gaj an Art Gallery owner in Cape Town RSA,I have been operating for four years and have worked towards receiving a major oppurtunity which requires some urgent start up capital of about US 10 000.00 are you able to help, I have all the paper work available.Thanks for now.
    Gary James Wentworth
    ARTAPART the Gallery.
    107 Sir Lowry Road Woodstock,Cape Town